|
|
Post by hebrews1135 on May 18, 2017 21:22:09 GMT
Poop-filled Coke cans are a real mystery3/29/17 Soda poop - Police have launched an investigation after human waste was discovered in a shipment of Coke cans. Coca-Cola have confirmed none of the products on sale is affected following the gross find. Where was the human waste in Coca-Cola found? The discovery was made at the Knockmore Hill facility in Lisburn, Ireland. The affected cans arrived from a German supplier that hadn’t been used previously. The night shift at the factory was disrupted when stunned workers peeked into the cans and saw the waste after the machines became clogged. A source told the Irish Independent: “It was absolutely horrible, and the machines had to be turned off for about 15 hours to be cleaned. “It was unusual because normally the cans come from somewhere else in the UK, but this time they apparently came from Germany.” How did human waste get into Coca-Cola? The source told the paper: “The rumor is that some poor immigrants could have made that long journey in the [truck] and that in their desperation were forced to use the cans instead of a toilet. It’s really shocking — and beyond the shock of finding something pretty disgusting in the cans is the thought there could have been poor people in that situation. And if they did make that journey, where are they now?” According to the Belfast Telegraph, the cans arrive at the factory without tops on, and are then filled with drink before being sealed and sold across Northern Ireland. nypost.com/2017/03/29/factory-workers-find-poop-in-coca-cola-cans
|
|
|
|
Post by hebrews1135 on May 19, 2017 21:55:08 GMT
Diet Soda Linked to Increased Risk of DementiaIf it says “diet” it must be good for you, right? At least better than the non-diet version…? When it comes to swapping out sugary soft drinks with diet soda, most people assume they are doing their health a favor. This mentality and safety message has been reinforced through marketing campaigns and has even been endorsed by members of the medical and nutrition communities. However, new research cast serious doubts on the safety of some of the artificial sweeteners that are used to replace sugar in diet soft drinks. New Research This research, published in the journal Stroke, comes from the lab of Sudha Seshadri, a professor of neurology at the Boston University School of Medicine and a faculty member at BU’s Alzheimer’s Disease Center. The authors of this study were interested in whether or not there was an association between the consumption of sugary beverages and dementia and stroke, so they used data from the well-known Framingham Heart Study to test if there was a relationship. Using food frequency questionnaires, the researchers divided study participants into three groups based on their dietary habits—those consuming sugary beverages (including juices), those consuming sugar-sweetened soft drinks (not including juice), and those consuming artificially sweetened beverages—and tracked these people for 10 years to see what health outcomes could be associated with their beverage choices. The first piece of data reported on in their study was that the prevalence of cardiovascular disease and diabetes in study participants actually increased with greater consumption of artificially sweetened soft drinks and that it was lower in the group who consumed sugary beverages.[1] It is possible that those with diabetes and cardiovascular disease were more likely to consume these drinks, however the authors did factor this into their analysis. Regardless, this initial finding casts serious doubts about the safety of artificially sweetened soft drinks and as surprising as it may sound, this isn’t the first study to link artificial sweeteners to the development of diabetes (more on that later). Shocking Findings Perhaps even more shocking is that when the researchers compared those participants frequently consuming artificially sweetened soft drinks to those consuming none, the risk for developing dementia increased by two-fold and the risk of having a stroke increased three-fold over the ten year follow-up period. Because of the close relationship between the development of diabetes and dementia, the authors repeated their analysis, removing those who had developed diabetes. They still found that the consumption of artificially sweetened soft drinks was related to the development of dementia—and that the development of diabetes was only partially responsible. Taken together, these observations should make us question the safety of these purportedly “safe” artificial sweeteners. This study is not the first to report that greater consumption of artificially sweetened soft drinks is associated with poor health outcomes. Research published in the journal Nature in 2014 showed artificial sweeteners could cause prediabetes-like symptoms in certain people, based on the composition of their gut bacteria. Several other large scale studies have reported that greater consumption of these types of beverages are associated with poor vascular health, however, to my knowledge this was the first study to link consumption of artificially sweetened soft drinks to an increased risk of dementia. What Happened? There is no way to know exactly what artificial sweeteners are to blame, however the artificial sweeteners that were approved at the time of this study were saccharin, acesulfame, and aspartame, while sucralose and neotame were approved not long after the observational period ended. While no mechanism was investigated in this study, one hypothesis put forth by the authors is that these artificial sweeteners may result in the disruption of the incredibly important microbial ecosystem in the gut—this disruption is known as dysbiosis. This is a valid hypothesis, as microbial dysbiosis has been implicated in numerous diseases, such as Alzheimer’s, depression, diabetes, obesity, and many other diseases. It’s also possible that when dietary ingredients are determined to be “safe” their effects on the gut microbiota are not considered. Indeed, the late Jack Challem gives a rundown of a well-designed experiment that showed how different artificial sweeteners cause unique disruptions to the gut microbiota in this excellent article. Not All Sweeteners Are Created Equally When it comes to non-caloric sweeteners and health effects, they can be divided into two camps: artificial sweeteners (like aspartame) and non-caloric natural sweeteners (such as stevia) that come from plants. Currently it seems that peer-reviewed research is starting to suggest that avoiding artificial sweeteners is advantageous to our health. The non-caloric natural sweeteners may be a great alternative to artificial sweeteners, and research on these products so far has been quite encouraging.[2] Nonetheless, sweeteners should always be used in moderation. To learn more about different sweeteners and the research on their health effects, you can read “The Definitive Guide to Natural Sweeteners Part 1 and Part 2.” As far as conclusions that can be drawn from this study go, it seems like removing artificial sweeteners that are made in a lab from your diet is a smart move. If you are concerned about the health of your gut microbiota for whatever reason, consuming probiotics, probiotic-rich fermented foods, and fruits and vegetables is a great way to cultivate the health of these ever important microbes. www.naturalgrocers.com/health-hotline-magazine/articles/research-alert-diet-soda-linked-to-increased-risk-of-dementia/?utm_source=Natural+Grocers+-+Health+Hotline
|
|
|
|
Post by hebrews1135 on May 23, 2017 21:18:06 GMT
No fruit juice for kids under 1, doctors say5/22/17 - Parents may be unknowingly giving their young children too much fruit juice, as an influential group of doctors now say kids under 1 should not be given any at all. The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) announced on Monday new guidelines to address one of the most commonly asked questions among parents. “An AAP policy statement published in 2001 and reaffirmed in 2006 recommended no juice for children younger than 6 months of age, 4-6 ounces daily for children ages 1-6 years and 8-12 ounces for children 7 and older,” the AAP said in a statement on its website. “Since then, however, considerable concern has been expressed about increasing obesity rates and risks for dental caries.” QUINOA 'MILK' DIET KILLED BABY, AUTHORITIES SAY The new policy, which was detailed in Fruit Juice in Infants, Children and Adolescents: Current Recommendations, indicates that 100 percent fruit juice should not be provided to children younger than 1 unless there is a medical reason for it “in the management of constipation.” For children ages 1-3, the AAP recommends a maximum daily intake of 4 ounces. Children ages 3-6 should receive no more than 4-6 ounces of fruit juice daily, while those 7 and older should receive a maximum of 8 ounces. “Families of small children with dental caries should have a discussion with their pediatrician about the child’s fruit juice intake and its possible contribution to the caries,” the AAP wrote. STUDENT DIES AFTER PLAYING DANGEROUS 'CHOKING' GAME The group said that while a correlation between fruit juice and childhood obesity remains uncertain, it recommends eliminating 100 percent fruit juice from the diets of children with excessive weight gain, but not from the diets of all children. “The policy clarifies that there is virtually no role for juice during the first year of life and that expensive juice products designed specifically for infants are not of value,” the AAP wrote. www.foxnews.com/health/2017/05/22/no-fruit-juice-for-kids-under-1-doctors-say.html
|
|
|
|
Post by hebrews1135 on May 24, 2017 20:02:41 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by hebrews1135 on May 25, 2017 20:36:04 GMT
|
|
